The Problem
Workforce data is supposed to guide decisions. Too often, it confuses instead. Labels like IT or Advanced Manufacturing sound neat and singular, but they hide messy clusters of very different jobs. Industry data can even make matters worse as jobs get double-counted, categories overlap, and people are left asking impossible questions: Is IT or Finance a better bet, when half of Finance is really FinTech?
The truth is that career paths no longer stay neatly inside industry lines. Skills are portable, and mobility is essential. A software developer may work for a bank, a hospital, or a school, but the work done is the same. Insisting on rigid industry experience often disqualifies talent for no good reason.
Industry may be the language of business, but skills are the language of workers.
Our Solution
ClearPATH replaces jargon with a practical roadmap. It provides a data framework that complements traditional industry data while enabling us to build a new skills-based one. Clusters use our existing vernacular: IT, Advanced Manufacturing, Life Sciences, or STEM but now we can provide a single, shared definition. The taxonomy is designed to be adaptable and respond to the needs of workforce practitioners. We can refine definitions, change terminology, or add additional taxonomic ranks to dive into a subset of occupations within a cluster.
ClearPATH also simplifies analysis for those who are not data experts. Wages, job counts, barriers to entry, growth rates, automation risks are all important, but weighing them together is hard. Our Opportunity Score does that work. It distills the complexity into a single number, from 0–100, so users can compare career clusters and industries at a glance.
We have also started the process to map education to occupations so that we can clearly show individuals how to pursue career pathways and let employers validate the needs and providers to ensure we are truly setting everyone up for success.
Why it Matters
ClearPATH turns workforce data into a usable language. For job seekers, it highlights careers that pay a living wage and build resilience. For educators and training providers, it shows the real-world value of their programs by tying them directly to demand. For employers and economic developers, it exposes skill gaps and talent pipelines with clarity.
And this is only the start. Future versions will sharpen employer-level insights, trace career progression, and help us turn data from noise into a practical guide for action.